A Mesmerizing Glimpse into Minoan Civilization
Intro
For more than a century, the Phaistos Disc (also spelled Phaistos Disk, Phaestos Disc) has remained a subject of intense controversy and fascination since its initial discovery in 1908 by Italian archaeologist Luigi Pernier at the Minoan palace of Phaistos on the south coast of the island of Crete.
Its authenticity has been a topic of heated debate, while numerous attempts have been made to decipher the mysterious pictographs adorning its surface. The interpretations of the disc’s meaning have been incredibly diverse, ranging from seeing it as an epic adventure tale to a religious invocation, a record of political administration, an almanac, and even a board game.
Furthermore, the disc’s peculiar nature has given rise to more imaginative and speculative interpretations, with some suggesting that it serves as a form of communication from extra-terrestrial beings or acts as a portal to hidden dimensions in the cosmos.
The Phaistos Disc stands as one of the most captivating mysteries in the realm of archaeology, captivating researchers and enthusiasts alike for over a century. This ancient artifact continues to defy explanation.
The Phaistos Disc: An Overview
Composed of fired clay and adorned with a spiralling sequence of mysterious symbols on both sides, the disc has become a symbol of intrigue, sparking intense debate and speculation among scholars worldwide.
The Phaistos Disc, measuring approximately 15 centimetres in diameter and featuring a total of 242 symbols, was created during the middle or late Minoan Bronze Age, roughly dating back to 1700-1600 BCE. While its purpose and precise meaning remain elusive, it is believed to have played a significant role within the Minoan civilization, a highly advanced Bronze Age culture that thrived on the island of Crete.
The inscription on the Phaistos Disc was created by pressing pre-formed hieroglyphic seals onto the soft clay in a spiral sequence towards the centre of the disc. It was then fired at high temperatures. Some archaeologists believe that the script on the Phaistos Disc is Minoan, but it is neither Linear A nor Linear B. Approximately 10 signs on the disc are similar to signs found in the Linear script. For this reason, other specialists attribute its origin to a non-Cretan source. For example, according to the “Proto-Ionic” theory, the disc could be the work of a Cycladic people.
The dating has been controversial, with some archaeologists dating the Disc to be around 1850-1650 BCE, while others claim that the artifact is older, around 1400 BCE. Currently, the best estimates date it around 1750 BCE, making it the first printed document in history. It could be said that the Phaistos Disc is a precursor to the various types of printing used in China 2500 years later and in medieval Europe 3100 years later.
Is the Phaistos Disc a Forgery?
In the summer of 2008, a fascinating controversy surrounding the Phaistos Disc unfolded when Jerome Eisenberg, an expert in ancient art forgeries, made a startling claim. Eisenberg accused Luigi Pernier, the original discoverer of the disc, of having forged the artifact. The accusation caused quite a stir, leading to a symposium (original source) being organized in the autumn of the same year to delve into the matter more deeply.
Eisenberg’s argument was based on the possibility of dating the disc using a thermoluminescence test. However, in 2009, the Greek curators responsible for the disc did not grant permission for it to be examined, preventing Eisenberg’s proposed test from being conducted.
Contrary to Eisenberg’s claims, the authenticity of the Phaistos Disc has been supported by subsequent discoveries made after its excavation in 1908. In 1955, a sealing was uncovered that displayed the only known parallel to sign 21, also known as the “comb” symbol found on the Phaistos Disc. This finding provided further evidence in favour of the disc’s legitimacy.
“It is generally assumed that sign 21 (the “comb”) occurs on only two artefacts, both from Phaistos: the first is the disk, found in 1908, while the second is sealing HM 992 found in a secured context nearly half a century later.36 Since the sealing is genuine, sign 21 is a genuine Minoan sign. It cannot be reasonably assumed that a forger would hit the exact form of such a complex, highly arbitrary character just by chance. In order to prove the disk a forgery, it has therefore to be demonstrated that in 1908 – somewhere, somehow – a source for sign 21 was already known.” Source: Anodos – Studies of the Ancient World
In light of these additional discoveries and the supporting evidence, Eisenberg’s hypothesis was ultimately dismissed during the symposium. Scholars and experts in attendance leaned towards maintaining the widely accepted belief in the Phaistos Disc’s authenticity, concluding that Pernier’s remarkable find was indeed an invaluable artifact from the past.
Interpretation Challenges
Most interpretations assume that the Phaistos Disc is a syllabary with interspersed logographic symbols (a logogram being a sign that represents a word or concept on its own). This is a characteristic feature of syllabaries known from the ancient Near East, such as Linear B (the writing system used for writing Mycenaean Greek on the Greek mainland), cuneiform, and hieroglyphics.
Deciphering the symbols on the Phaistos Disc has proven to be a formidable challenge for researchers. Several factors contribute to this difficulty.
Firstly, the disc is an isolated artifact, with no similar examples found to provide a comparative analysis. Secondly, the Minoan hieroglyphic writing system itself remains un-deciphered, limiting our understanding of the symbolic language utilized during this period. Lastly, the absence of accompanying texts or inscriptions further complicates the task of unravelling the disc’s meaning.
Theories and Interpretations
Over the years, numerous theories have been proposed in attempts to decipher the Phaistos Disc. Some scholars argue that it represents an early form of writing, while others suggest it may have been a board game, a religious object, or even a magical talisman. Despite the lack of a definitive answer, various intriguing theories have emerged:
Syllabic Writing System
Another viewpoint suggests that the symbols on the disc represent a form of pictographic writing, where each symbol corresponds to a specific word or concept. Proponents of this theory compare the disc to other ancient writing systems, such as Egyptian hieroglyphs.
Pictographic Script
Another viewpoint suggests that the symbols on the disc represent a form of pictographic writing, where each symbol corresponds to a specific word or concept. Proponents of this theory compare the disc to other ancient writing systems, such as Egyptian hieroglyphs.
Astrological Significance
A different perspective speculates that the symbols hold astronomical or astrological significance, potentially representing celestial bodies, constellations, or cosmic events. This interpretation draws attention to the disc’s circular shape and spiralling symbols.
Ritualistic or Magical Object
Some researchers propose that the disc served a ritualistic or magical purpose within the Minoan culture. It could have been employed as a divination tool or a religious artifact used in ceremonies.
Has the Phaistos Disc been deciphered?
The latest person to claim to have successfully deciphered it was Gareth Owens in 2018, a linguist from the Technological Educational Institute of Crete, in collaboration with John Coleman, a phonetics professor at Oxford.
According to Owens, with the help of comparative linguistics, he has determined that the text on the disc “has the vowel values of Linear B.” He believes that “the Phaistos Disc is the best example of ‘Cretan hieroglyphs’,” and claims that around 80% of the Phaistos Disc can be read using Linear B or Mycenaean Greek, the oldest known form of the Greek language.
However, as he acknowledges, one thing is reading it, and another is understanding its meaning. He also added, “The writing on the Phaistos Disc is also Minoan Linear A.” This writing system was used by the Cretans from 1800-1450 BCE and belongs to a group that evolved independently from the Egyptian and Mesopotamian systems. What is most interesting is that, despite all efforts, it has not been fully deciphered. It was later succeeded by Linear B, which the Mycenaeans (mainland Greeks) used as an early form of Greek.
Only time will tell if Owens is correct and if ultimately it proves useful in deciphering one of the ancient languages that still eludes us. That is, of course, if the disc is not a fraud committed by its discoverer, Pernier, as claimed by Jerome E. Eisenberg in an article published in the July and August 2008 issue of the archaeological and ancient art magazine Minerva.
Conclusion
While no definitive breakthrough has been achieved thus far, collaborative efforts between archaeologists, linguists, historians, computer scientists and technological advancements such as image analysis, pattern recognition, and machine learning continue to play a crucial role in tackling the Phaistos Disc’s enigma.
Ultimately, the Phaistos Disc continues to serve as a tantalizing reminder of the vast knowledge and mysteries that lay hidden within the depths of the ancient world. Its presence ignites curiosity and fuels the passion of researchers who are driven to uncover its true purpose and significance.
If You Enjoyed This Content, Feel Free To Leave A Tip Or Visit One Of The Sponsor Adverts